Quote Originally Posted by jackjohnson View Post
The Journal of the American Medical Association doesn’t seem to agree with much of the “information “ being put out. Nor does Johns Hopkins. I am guessing those are better sources of medical information
I definitely agree Jack but with the caveat that the person needs to be able consume the information and arrive at meaningful conclusions. One of the major issues of today's world is that everyone thinks "googling" something is the same thing as complete critical thinking, research, and/or is the easy way to get a scientific answer.

Often for quick super simple and "readily accepted facts" that does end up being true.

However, it's also quite often, particularly in new territory such as the virus, that people simply don't know how to properly research, check their sources, the validity or credibility of the data, cross referencing it, etc etc... or they don't have enough background information for a certain essay or group of essays to provide them enough data to formulate their own unique ideas and truly understand it.