Simple solution:
Just don’t review SB’s on OH2, Eccie and similar sites. A SB/SD arrangement is a much more private matter than hiring an escort
Simple solution:
Just don’t review SB’s on OH2, Eccie and similar sites. A SB/SD arrangement is a much more private matter than hiring an escort
Five star experiences with THE five star Ebony Goddess
This was my exact point. Thank you.
- - - Updated - - -
Yes, exactly. Not all of these girls are escorts in their minds lol so it does tend to scare them when they see their real name and damn near the actual location of their personal home. These women don't think or protect themselves and personal information like escorts unless they are schooled.
Awaiting account deactivation, no longer available. Be safe, all the best!
EXACTLY
I cringe at SB reviews on ECCIE that have the SB's contact info such as phone or email visible because it's more than likely their
personal contact info since as you said, most of them don't know nor care to protect themselves
Seeking also doesn't age verify their sugar baby accounts, and many other websites that bros find pay for play (P4P) on don't age verify either.
Yet, they'll end up being reviewed on ECCIE, of course. Despite not being verified on ECCIE....
escort review sites should only allow reviews of the escorts that are actually registered AND verified on there such as TNABoard & PrivateDelights
review boards like ECCIE give bros the freedom to review any P4P encounter with anyone
Anyone.
companions should incorporate reputation management of their stage name via Mention,
so that they can be aware of whenever & wherever they're mentioned or reviewed online... my $0.02
Last edited by Phoenixx; 05-30-2019 at 06:14 PM.
Interesting topic. I appreciate you raising the concerns you have Kimberly. Personally, I always wondered about the ethics of reviewing a SB on an escort-client site especially since I wondered if said SB even knew the review existed or consented to be reviewed. It always made me feel a way. It's just a reality that some clients get off on seeking out new, young, inexperienced, "non-pro" people on sites like SA and WYP specifically because they enjoy the thrill of finding a diamond in the rough who's willing to spend several hours with them for what most escorts charge for only an hour.
But in my mind they can't have it both ways. If you want someone who isn't a pro so you can arrange a 300 PPM and spend three, four, five, or more hours with someone for that amount, then keep up your end of the bargain by at least maintaining some discretion.
Returning to New Orleans February 27th to 29th, 2024
Story ❉ Salivate ❉ Submission
Deposit and verification required.
Advance notice is greatly appreciated.
Boom! I wholeheartedly agree. In addition to the points you and Kimberly addressed about clients possibly unknowingly outing an SB's IRL name and contact, there's this...
It's funny because ECCIE went to such great lengths to appease the payment processors and attempt to limit some of their liability. But there are so many ways they are exposed. And allowing men to post reviews which partially function as ads on non-age verified people, meanwhile a provider can't post herself if she didn't submit age verification seems very precarious.
Returning to New Orleans February 27th to 29th, 2024
Story ❉ Salivate ❉ Submission
Deposit and verification required.
Advance notice is greatly appreciated.
Awaiting account deactivation, no longer available. Be safe, all the best!
Talking about sugar babies, this one doesn't have sex and makes 20,000 a month. Interesting
https://viralfeels.com/sugar-baby-re...ing-with-them/