So far, there is nothing that has been submitted to Staff to definitively establish that the reviews are true or false. So they will remain where they are.
If anyone has anything that will show us one way or the other, we would like to see it.
The membership has been around for a long time and will consider the reviewer and his board history here when considering his credibility. They can pretty much sort out who is genuine and who is not. If you have seen the replies to those threads, their assessment is obvious.
