Asking for a menu. Isn’t this incriminating?

[Phoenixx]

Really, the only federal laws related to this subject deal with human trafficking across state lines, and child pornography. Prostitution and promotion of obscenity are typically state law-controlled. Practically speaking, most prostitution cases around here come from two sources: vice doing sting operations (renting a motel room, enticing johns, or responding to craigslist-type ads (after FOSTA) and setting the provider up, trying to get them to speak the magic words...), or responding to "citizen complaints." For providers, this means your nosy neighbors can snitch on you; it also means you advertise on "public" sites (like AS, for example) at your own risk. It would take a bit more time, effort, deception and sophistication on the part of LE to actually join this site or eccie and create an account, just to try to set up providers. I'm not thinking the cops are that motivated, but I could certainly be wrong. Anyhow, the point I was trying to make is that, for both providers and hobbyists, sites like this one are the best insurance against getting popped by LE. You still need to be careful, do your research, and screen out anyone who feels off, like Ms.Rogue says, but it's much much better than relying on the general internet to find what you're looking for.

informants tho

[typhoon663]

Not to be argumentative here, but LE only uses CIs in drug cases, and larger ones at that. Never heard of them using CIs for vice cases...but if you know something specific, I'd bow to your greater knowledge.

[mathguy]

Good points Typhoon (in previous 2 replies). I agree with the large majority of what you were saying. Just to be clear. Nothing I was saying was meant to be construed as argument; rather reinforcement of your own arguments would be a better description, or even, "addition".

-MG

[Drtry1]

Why not just ask what’s NOT on the menu, nothing incriminating there

[JFLYER]

Why not just ask what’s NOT on the menu, nothing incriminating there

In addition to not being incriminating, it allows them to adjust for the prospective client and time. "No this or that "today and on another day it will be an "open menu" with the same provider.

[Westley]

Not to be argumentative here, but LE only uses CIs in drug cases, and larger ones at that. Never heard of them using CIs for vice cases...but if you know something specific, I'd bow to your greater knowledge.

I disagree. Law enforcement is just a component of the American criminal justice system. Unfortunately, the objective at certain levels and in certain locations may not be to enforce law or administer justice but to generate revenue. It have been my observations for more than half a century that some components of the criminal justice will leverage tempest technology, CIs, asset forfeiture and plea bargining to generate revenue, keep for-profit confinement at maximum capacity and split the proceeds among the agencies involved under the sham of tax savings. Sex workers are sometimes perceived as low hanging fruit by corrupt members of law enforcement and overzealous prosecutors as well as judges and juries that suffer implicit bias. Considerating advances in technology and recent laws I totally get why some providers are reluctant to see newbies, demand cash only transactions and restrict playdates to regulars to minimize risk.

[Phoenixx]

Not to be argumentative here, but LE only uses CIs in drug cases, and larger ones at that. Never heard of them using CIs for vice cases...but if you know something specific, I'd bow to your greater knowledge.

here's some greater knowledge

Blue Ash Investigation Uses Confidential Informant (CI)

Men Proposition CI During Sting

LE Uses Outrageous Tactics to Police Prostitution


the greater knowledge even hit review boards...

a provider in the Midwest was a narc on Grain Belt News review forum: Alexis Texas Warning

then, a provider in Shreveport, LA was a narc on the infamous E: Sting in Shreveport


there's more greater knowledge to come as prostitution continues to be criminalized...... ugh

[StopShort]

Gentle suggestions, look for her reviews that have details in the fees & ACTIVITIES.

That my work sometimes but not all. I just experienced this for myself. I went to see a lady that had rave reviews on E. I saw activities that I prefer on the reviews. When I went to see said lady, she claimed that she "doesn't do" some of the activities that I've seen on reviews. So, it's hard to tell whether this was a YMMV thing or if the reviews were a crock of shit.

[JFLYER]

That my work sometimes but not all. I just experienced this for myself. I went to see a lady that had rave reviews on E. I saw activities that I prefer on the reviews. When I went to see said lady, she claimed that she "doesn't do" some of the activities that I've seen on reviews. So, it's hard to tell whether this was a YMMV thing or if the reviews were a crock of shit.

*I* have thought that a lot of those 'reviews' were just some guys bragging. Thanks for confirming my private opinion. Reviews SEEM to me to be good indicators rather than certainties. Obviously this or that provider may not wish to participate with this or that service with this or that monger. However, (again) *I* thought that was a given. YMMV

My approach (which is probably all wrong) is to privately ask what the providers "do not's" are as the answer to that question is pretty straight forward. Someone here taught me that one pretty painfully so it is one of the very first questions I get an answer to.

[LovelyEvelyn]

Personally, I don't care if you guys ask. I will tell you my limits. I screen heavily and do not see everyone who sends an interest my way, so I'm not really concerned with getting "busted". About 95+% of my business is repeat, many I've been seeing for years. 🤷🏻*♀️

[LovelyEvelyn]

Regarding reviews, take them with a grain of salt. Majority of it may be accurate but sometimes dudes embellish not only the "activities" but how big their dick is ("I pulled out my magnum condom...") and the results ("She came back to back from my magic tongue"). It's basically story telling at its finest, and some are better at telling stories than others.

Personally, I think of reviews as a dick measuring contest for some of you guys. Sorry. Lol Like, who can come up with the best fantasy about a supposed experience so they can high five their home boys.

[Threeholeking]

LovelyEvelyn...that is so true...too funny!!!

[mathguy]

Regarding reviews, take them with a grain of salt. Majority of it may be accurate but sometimes dudes embellish not only the "activities" but how big their dick is ("I pulled out my magnum condom...") and the results ("She came back to back from my magic tongue"). It's basically story telling at its finest, and some are better at telling stories than others.

Personally, I think of reviews as a dick measuring contest for some of you guys. Sorry. Lol Like, who can come up with the best fantasy about a supposed experience so they can high five their home boys.

LovelyEvelyn...that is so true...too funny!!!

Hahahaha. Yep so true. Lmao.

They have some truth to them, the activities are mostly gonna be true, but many are far from objective or telling the truth about the girls reactions or what she said/exactly how she did it. Or they have entirely romanticized or became deluded by their visit. Lol. Hahaha. So many are like that.

[GeorgeDRII]

Well Evelyn knows my size at least and the good time we had together. We need to get together again sometime Lovely!

[BigDallas]

Hey creep must you respond to almost every post that providers make you sound like fucking stalking weirdo!