Quote:
I agree with you Giz. ASPD needs to come out of the dark ages and join the world of today.
I'm not against reviews, what I'm against is the way they are done. And your right keeping things hidden from us women is wrong, just wrong. I see no sense in it. By having it set up this way the guys are setting themselves up to be lied to with almost NO safety checks. Most of the women won't buck the system for fear of being labeled drama queens or trouble makers.
I don't care what I'm labeled, I'm going to tell the truth, period. I've always maintained a high standard in my reviews being truthful and I'll continue to back that up till the day I retire.
ASPD has the chance to make changes at this time. It would be ashame to waste that chance and go back to a system that really doesnt work very well.
Why be afraid of change is my question?[/b]
And I just happen to disagree with both yours and Giz's assessment that ASPD was in the dark ages.....And you still haven't answered why it's ok for the women to have their gender restricted areas and can lie about the men (and I know they do lie on several boards and I'm sure they do it on ASPD and home2 also), but you have this huge disdain for the BCD areas on ASPD.....There are plenty of times when a reviewer has blatantly lied about a session and when he was found out, that review was removed and often the reviewer was either banned or suspended.....Fake reviews were/are considered a serious offense.....Blatant lying about what happened in a review probably wasn't considered as serious, but it was a serious offense and generally if found out that reviewer lost his own credibility.....See, I just don't buy the "we need reviews to be out in the open because we want the truth to be told" angle.....Most reviewers are going to tell the truth in a review, and for those who are going to lie, even if you could read the review, you can't respond to the review thread.....