Consent or you've committed assault
Agreed, no LE will allow fondling. So if one is touching any privates then it's much safer to assume they aren't LE. But it is also illegal to iffer to touch peoples privates for $, with the intent to arouse, under all of the prostitution laws. And I understand, prostitution and solicitation laws are about offering the $ for services, not engaging in the acts. But I've read articles where courts have apparently considered the $ paid for the door fee at an amp as a solicitation offer if the people end up engaging in any acts. Sooo, I dunno.
But I guess that's why my question about video surveillance is important to me. If LE got a court order to hide cameras, (and Id still love to know how easy or difficult that is for them), but if, I'd assume they would video a lot of people who are still committing a felony....even if its as simple as touching breasts. The AMP worker may have consented, so it's not assault, but they consented for $, so It's still felony prostitution or solicitation. So how easy it is for LE to get that court order is a big deal for me. Let's face it, in every amp bust in my country over the last few years, it's been US agencies working with local LE to try and stop trafficking. I'd assume, for now, that's a big enough deal where the court orders may not be too difficult to get. But I just don't know enough about the law on court orders for video surveillance.