Have had several dudes ask me to vouch for them. Is that allowed?
Printable View
Have had several dudes ask me to vouch for them. Is that allowed?
I had a similar incident that took place with a female companion vouching for me and it went downhill with Fancy catching grief about it not being fair so, a hobbyist stepped in & did a vouch to resolve the problem.
Just sharing my experience and don't know if that has changed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldGent
Since the questions have been asked and answered before and have arisen yet again with the flood of new members, here's the gouge:Quote:
Originally Posted by Universal
The basic requirement for a hobbyist to be vouched is by a verified companion here (or possibly via elsewhere depending on circumstances and accesses: eccie, P411, several other established website)
The basic requirement for a companion to be vouched is by a verified hobbyist/verified companion here (or elsewhere ^^^ etc.
In the past hobbyverse era, in a very few extreme circumstances, some exceptions were made; but not now in the current hobbyverse.
Hope that helps!
Thanks CK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Universal
wtf.... I’ve vouched for companions with no issue
I have vouched for alot of ladies here
yep, got a message from Fancy that people felt it wasn't fair that a well known verified companion shouldn't vouch for me and it should be averified man. I expressed an easy solution to the problem by getting a verified hobbyist that had seen me BCD. Two vouches is better than one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Universal
:wtf:
Ok, then verified men should only be moderators as well then....
I made a thread to help get the fair system under control so they wouldn't complain to Fancy about partiality. I took extra steps to resolve the problem.
https://home.ourhome2.net/vb/showthread.php?120185-Clarification-On-Notice
Quote:
Originally Posted by Universal
CK would’ve been just fine with the (verified) lady’s vouch... srsly
!
Universal, I honestly don't recall our entire conversation or the exact wording; it has been many months and I've occasionally had to clear my PM box by necessity since I receive thousands of messages, so anything that related to members who achieved validation was cleaned out up until I was able to recently increase my capacity. (Vouches are stored on the H2 system, of course.) I would have advised you to the best of my knowledge based on circumstances and valid reasons at that time, not all of which may have been obvious then... or appropriate to explain in public now.
Vouches, also frequently referred to as session confirmations, must be made by verified members who have actually MET other persons in the flesh BCD, and that usually entails male hobbyists and female providers physically getting together (although we have a few male providers onsite), OR companions who have worked together in P4P. Electronic communication/association alone between members doesn't apply.
I may have misunderstood something, but I just don't quite remember, sorry. I always try to be polite and informative, and don't think that our interaction "went downhill" or that I gave you "grief," but I realize that can be interpretive, so my apologies if I offended you in any way as I was trying to assist you, as it wasn't personal or my intention. Your vouches (both of them) were perused by ck and you were verified and have enjoyed full status/privileges here since.
My sole goal has always been to be careful and thorough when helping with the validation process (and anything else onsite) to protect and support the interests, safety, standards, and integrity of H2, and while I have double checked/confirmed/forwarded hundreds of vouches by both lads and lassies, to be absolutely clear the chief admin evaluates EVERY vouch submitted, and ONLY ck1942 approves ALL verifications at his discretion based on the parameters stated above.
Thanks. -- FIH/staff
Closing this thread since the OP's question has been answered.
Additional issues may or may not be that relevant, and individual's issues imo are usually better addressed in PMs than in public discussions which can and often do wander off in other directions.