Boom! I wholeheartedly agree. In addition to the points you and Kimberly addressed about clients possibly unknowingly outing an SB's IRL name and contact, there's this...

It's funny because ECCIE went to such great lengths to appease the payment processors and attempt to limit some of their liability. But there are so many ways they are exposed. And allowing men to post reviews which partially function as ads on non-age verified people, meanwhile a provider can't post herself if she didn't submit age verification seems very precarious.


Quote Originally Posted by Phoenixx View Post



...Seeking also doesn't age verify their sugar baby accounts, and many other websites that bros find pay for play (P4P) on don't age verify either.
Yet, they'll end up being reviewed on ECCIE, of course. Despite not being verified on ECCIE....

escort review sites should only allow reviews of the escorts that are actually registered AND verified on there such as TNABoard & PrivateDelights

review boards like ECCIE give bros the freedom to review any P4P encounter with anyone..