What's the current meta for incalls on how to present/leave donation?

[ChevyGuy]

Maybe that's why you're not verified? Gotta look at it from 3 angles: Your's, the lady's, and LE'S. Sure, it looks more random for LE, but to the lady it looks like an insulting tip.

Given the odds of seeing the lady again vs. LE I will pass on that extra plausible deniability...

it was a joke my dude, don't take it too seriously. maybe i don't want to get verified? :)

LE won't care if its 29.55 or 50 as long as they can establish money exchange for solicitation. as plausible deniability goes if we (me, you and others) fallow all rules and common sence when we establish contact - we should be good.

worst case: dont even give them any excuse "thats the money i had" the only line you want to say is "i respectfully refuse to answer your questions and want to exercise my right to remain silent until my lawyer arrives"

[Ben Rhimene]

it was a joke my dude, don't take it too seriously. maybe i don't want to get verified? :)

Are you just trying to increase your post count?

Cuz bad punctuation + little value add suggests as much. Unless you claim are a lawyer I'll go out on a limb and suggest your knowledge of LE is flawed, and if you do claim you are I will match bar creds against your's any day.

Typo of "sense" etc suggests you are less serious than maybe you should be. Chevy is the lowest base model at GM so that tracks.

[ChevyGuy]

Are you just trying to increase your post count?

Cuz bad punctuation + little value add suggests as much. Unless you claim are a lawyer I'll go out on a limb and suggest your knowledge of LE is flawed, and if you do claim you are I will match bar creds against your's any day.

Typo of "sense" etc suggests you are less serious than maybe you should be. Chevy is the lowest base model at GM so that tracks.

you say "bad punctuation" and you start your counter argument with "cuz". i rest my case. also you are replaying to my thread, so.. just look at my profile, I'm no lawyer, just a laborer. thats why im here to listen to smarter people. appreciate you input!

chevy is blue collar people car - no need to dis it. im proud of my 2016 silverado (paid off though, what are your payments on sierra?)

[Ben Rhimene]

you say "bad punctuation" and you start your counter argument with "cuz". i rest my case. also you are replaying to my thread, so.. just look at my profile, I'm no lawyer, just a laborer. thats why im here to listen to smarter people. appreciate you input!

chevy is blue collar people car - no need to dis it. im proud of my 2006 silverado.

"Cuz" is not a typo. I have providers PMing me about your posts...that's NOT a good sign! Obviously you are not a lawyer cuz everyone can see the lack of intellect.

If you wanna spar I'm game, but so far I haven't put any effort into it.

Congrats on owning a Chevy...I did out out of school too...

[ChevyGuy]

- - - Updated - - -

"Cuz" is not a typo. I have providers PMing me about your posts...that's NOT a good sign! Obviously you are not a lawyer cuz everyone can see the lack of intellect.

If you wanna spar I'm game, but so far I haven't put any effort into it.

Congrats on owning a Chevy...I did out out of school too...

should i even bother replaying you... my dude, i tried to give you some leeway to back off - yet you want to go grammar nazi? you shouldn't use "typo" and "punctuation" in the same sentence then, english might be my 2nd language, but even i know better - one is for commas another is for spelling. also i doubt chevy was making cars the time you finished highschool, otherwise I hope you had fun in your Series C. the sticky in this thread said to try to be respectful, and i tried, but if admins deem i be banned so be it. also i don't spar with men, only ladies ;) (make a joke about being weak i welcome your fragile masculinity).

also ask them providers what car do i drive (you might be surprised). im not sure what are you even trying to flex here mr. OG ? lol

[NordicJag]

If you 2 are finished with your pissing match, I'd like to point out that paying a lady to spend time with you is not a crime. If there is never anything mentioned about sex in any correspondence, then there is no evidence.

[Ben Rhimene]

If there is never anything mentioned about sex in any correspondence, then there is no evidence.

NJ, that is simply not true. Prosecutions can occur without direct evidence if there is sufficient circumstantial evidence. As in, email/text/phone records, you are found with Suzy Sexworker in an hourly, she has 2 boxes of magnums in her purse, neither of you can provide matching testimony about who the other is, how you met, etc. That is ALL evidence, and a Hallmark card with benjis in it addressed to somebody who does not exist is not a helpful fact.

Ask any lawyer...there are plenty of prosecutions where key evidence is missing.