Originally Posted by
Shackdaddy
Ok, I've now seen a couple other Angel girls, so I thought I'd update my list, and I added my personal ranking in front of their names and two more ratings: one for overall rating at the end, and another rating I'll just call "How Bull Shit is their Photo?" the higher the BS rating the more touch up/photoshop or just outright not them on the photo; a low BS Rating means it was them with little work done. I probably personally put looks higher into my ranking that others might, so if you see my ranking not relate to the overall rating, that is why, the ranking is who I'd see first, second, etc.:
4. Vicky: Great service 9/10, looks so so 5 or 6/10, age probably early 40's, photo now gone but I'd say a 8/10 HIGH BS rating when there was one, Overall rating: 7/10 I would say overall a 9
5. Yuri: Great Service 8/10, looks good 6 or 7/10, age probably mid to late 30's, 7/10 High BS rating, overall rating: 6/10 She has left on Vacation, Agreed
3. Boa: So so service 6 or 7/10, looks very nice in my opinion 8 or 9/10 late 20's to mid 30's, 3 /10 low/moderate BS rating, she is a touch older in person but not much, overall rating: 6/10 I would say an 8, Love me some Boa
6. Rebecca: Good service 7/10, looks meh 5/10, age probably late 40's... maybe later, 9/10 HIGH BS rating, I think it oddly is her or parts of her photos, but HIGHLY Tampered with, buyer beware, overall rating: 4/10 I have not seen her yet...will take your advice
2. Emmy: So so service 6/10, looks great 8 or 9/10, age probably mid 20's to late 20's, 2 or 3/10 low BS rating, overall rating: 6/10 I think she is a 9, Young sweet ass. Licking her wetness after she came was better than Honey
1. Abby: Great service 9/10, looks good 7 or 8/10, age probably late 20's to early 30's, 0/10 ZERO BS rating (unheard of for them! lol), Overall rating: 8/10 Agreed
Shack
Posting Permissions