Originally Posted by
helblindi
I don't want to compromise anyone's security, but there's ought to be some leverage. Another thread had a gal saying she wouldn't provide verification without seeing a guy several times. I may be misunderstanding the purpose, but isn't the only thing getting verified is that a profile is a real person and that the person isn't law enforcement? Not vouchsafe the quality of their character. Just Human? yes. Cop? no. Done.
Thinking that gals who enjoy security without reciprocating for guys, well, after 2, 5, or 10 claims of not playing nice should be on probation of loosing their verified status or maybe a mark letting guys know she doesn't play well with others. Maybe the mark goes away automatically after a couple of days/weeks/whatever. Claims supported by screenshots of screening or whatever, not just "say so".
Thinking the same for gals that don't respond to other gals request for screening. If you can't play nice and let others know whether a guy was cool or a jerk, then that puts other girls at risk. Again, screenshot of the request w/ no response, but after a couple of no-responses, both guys and gals should know the status with a mark or something.
Just some ideas.
*** btw, sitting on day 3 with both verification confirmation pms sent in. Brittany's an awesome gal! Need a coder to automate this? I probably got a guy.