A reminder for the guys.

[Cameron]

Guys, please keep in mind, we (providers) are not the ones to verify you. We can simply vouch for you. It’s up to ck, fancy & staff to do that. So, please, don’t get discouraged & think we are the reason you’re not verified status.

[Nascobar21]

Thanks

[Universal]

Thanks

Exactly and a few people dn't know, 2references/vouches are required.
Exxxcellent thread.

[DocHoliday]

I recommend that any voucher PM sent to Admin. be CC’d to the person you are vouching for so they know you contacted Admin. with the voucher PM.

[Cameron]

I’ve had a couple guys contact me asking why they’re not verified yet, saying: well u must not have sent a pm, I’m not verified!.. I try to explain the process, but some guys think we are the ones who have control over it.

[Universal]

I’ve had a couple guys contact me asking why they’re not verified yet, saying: well u must not have sent a pm, I’m not verified!.. I try to explain the process, but some guys think we are the ones who have control over it.

Easy solution, they can jump on this thread, he can post the date/ time of the session and you confirm his comment with it being an incall or out.They can't say, you didn't confirm .

[Oral Empress]

Easy solution, they can jump on this thread, he can post the date/ time they did a session with you and you confirm the comment with it being an incall or out.They can't say, you didn't confirm the session.

I hesitate to have gentlemen or ladies so publicly confirm the dates/times of sessions, for the safety and security of all. Doc Holiday's suggestion about CC-ing the party in question is by far the best thing providers can do to assist hobbyists in the verification process, or rather in assuring them that we are doing our part.

As always though, gentlemen and ladies alike should always keep in mind that verified status is a term used on the boards only, and not a tried and true way to be considered "safe" on an all-inclusive level. Companions and mongers alike have their own individual methods of "verifying" those contacting them, of varying levels of depth and intensity, so as CK and other admins/mods regularly remind us: it is up to individuals to verify to their own satisfaction, verified status is simply to gain access to the more "exclusive" sections of the boards.

[Universal]

It would be no different than some man writing a review that has/gives some of the same information. Unless he doesn't want to write anything that is understandable.
Plus, new guys have a better chance with a board presents as a way to gauge his personality.
He doesn't necessarily have to write a time or date, popping on and thanking her for a session would suffice, that would be nice.
I can relate to her feelings that she is being accused or getting the 3rd degree about NOT sending in the vouch.

[Oral Empress]

It would be no different than some man writing a review that has/gives some of the same information. Unless he doesn't want to write anything that is understandable.
Plus, new guys have a better chance with a board presents as a way to gauge his personality.
He doesn't necessarily have to write a time or date, popping on and thanking her for a session would suffice, that would be nice.
I can relate to her feelings that she is being accused or getting the 3rd degree about NOT sending in the vouch.

Hence my statement's utilization of the term "hesitate" as opposed to one with a stronger connotation of disagreement. I too can relate to receiving flak for issues involving vouches, as can virtually every lady on OH2 that has had them requested of her. Oft times, we as a community forget how spoiled we have been in past years, and neglect to take into consideration that with the changes that occurred in 2019, our admin staff were/are exponentially busier than they had been prior to the cursed STA-bill-pair's passing, what with the forum page itself and the regular waves of new registrations as more people find their way here.

Hell, there are a couple of providers I referred to the page who took literal MONTHS to have their status changed to Verified Companion, despite several vouches being sent in by myself, multiple hobbyists, and even other providers these ladies were introduced to. Patience truly is a virtue, and one that should be observed much more closely than it has been of late.

[JessieJane]

I always send a pm over to "staff" for gents that are unverified. I include specific details. I only do this for gents I have actually seen. Keep in mind that if we meet and it doesn't go well please dont expect a vouch from Jess.

[GeorgeDRII]

Exactly Jessie. Guys you can't expect a lady to vouch for you, especially if you've had a bad session with said provider. Once the ladies have vouched for you, it's just a matter of time before you become verified. There is a list of names, as yours will fall into place when the vouches have been turned in for you.

[Universal]

BAD GUYS WON'T GET A VOUCH, Finally a method that works.

[Cameron]

Also: providers CAN SEE REVIEWS! We just can’t see what’s written in the rest of the story. So if you guys make remarks on our ads or on our reviews that you don’t want us to see, then you should probably make sure that those are private comments were only the gentleman can see.

[lovelyxxxo]

I recommend that any voucher PM sent to Admin. be CC’d to the person you are vouching for so they know you contacted Admin. with the voucher PM.

Yep i forward email to staffe and gentleman with my reply ..

[ck1942]

Easy solution, they can jump on this thread, he can post the date/ time of the session and you confirm his comment with it being an incall or out.They can't say, you didn't confirm .

^^^ big fat no to the above

Gents, have the companions PM ck1942 confirming the session from within the past 60 days.

^^^ above is the in place process.

However, while we have a tentative process in which staff also scans reviews and may ask the companion for direct confirmation, the direct confirmation (above) is what works.

However, the overloaded PMs are backed up and being cleared slowly.

Patience is appreciated.