Serious issues for those who review SBs!

To those who review sugar babies and are stupid enough to put her link, you do realize they will ban you both if you do that? Yes, the SB sites don't want us there, duh! I don't even see why this is allowed on escort sites because reviews are not going to be accurate.

She might get 500 from one and only 2 from another. She might spend 3 hours with one and barely an hour with the next.

You're screwing yourself and her by posting a review because the arrangement you make is only yours, no one else.

Just something I noticed some asshat is famous for on another site and why I refused to see him. Do you want to pay her double? Well might wanna keep the agreement you have.

SBs don't have a set rate and time, you're not guaranteed a damn thing which is why most of you do your homework. You can't penalize a SB like you can an escort, she doesn't have the rules an escort abides by.

Just a PSA because this is not cool, it's not discreet and it's outing people to boot. Many SBs use their real name because it's not considered as illegal as this. Many SDs do as well. I don't even know why the boards would allow this.

You might not care if you get banned, but you're messin with her income! She can only take new pics so many times and create new info. That's just not cool at all.

Good points and advice !

:twothumbs:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by myren1900

Good points and advice !

:twothumbs:

---

������

Could we get some handles please?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kimberly Kisses

To those who review sugar babies and are stupid enough to put her link, you do realize they will ban you both if you do that? Yes, the SB sites don't want us there, duh! I don't even see why this is allowed on escort sites because reviews are not going to be accurate.

She might get 500 from one and only 2 from another. She might spend 3 hours with one and barely an hour with the next.

You're screwing yourself and her by posting a review because the arrangement you make is only yours, no one else.

Just something I noticed some asshat is famous for on another site and why I refused to see him. Do you want to pay her double? Well might wanna keep the agreement you have.

SBs don't have a set rate and time, you're not guaranteed a damn thing which is why most of you do your homework. You can't penalize a SB like you can an escort, she doesn't have the rules an escort abides by.

Just a PSA because this is not cool, it's not discreet and it's outing people to boot. Many SBs use their real name because it's not considered as illegal as this. Many SDs do as well. I don't even know why the boards would allow this.

You might not care if you get banned, but you're messin with her income! She can only take new pics so many times and create new info. That's just not cool at all.

---

Why are overly mad about the amount of money SBs are getting. You mentioned it several times. The amount of money SBs are making and being upset that men have seen an SB instead???!!!

1. Up your rate of you're not satisfied with it. Dont be mad at other women for making more.... that's envious and jealous for no reason.

2. Sugar babies are actually companions. That means texting. Calling and spending time. Not always wam bam thank you ma'am.

3. There will always be **** that are sugar babies and sugar babies that are ****. Why let that mess up what you have going on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TexasRiley

Why are overly mad about the amount of money SBs are getting. You mentioned it several times. The amount of money SBs are making and being upset that men have seen an SB instead???!!!

1. Up your rate of you're not satisfied with it. Dont be mad at other women for making more.... that's envious and jealous for no reason.

2. Sugar babies are actually companions. That means texting. Calling and spending time. Not always wam bam thank you ma'am.

3. There will always be **** that are sugar babies and sugar babies that are ****. Why let that mess up what you have going on.

---

You completely missed the point! I am a sugar baby and a provider! My point was the money is being lost because SS sites are banning people with reviews on escort boards. I have a full time job, money is no issue. I'm taking up for providers who also do the sugar thing, not putting them down. I am one, thanks. How you missed that, I have no clue.

I mentioned the difference in rates because the sugar market is different and writing a review of a sugar baby on an escort site can HURT the income and get both people banned. My opening tag line said reviews of SBs was an issue, NOT seeing one. There's no SET rate for a sugar baby, so a review of us is stupid. I don't charge my SDs the same, but I DO charge the same for escort service because guys expect that. Another thing I said flat out. I don't know where your comprehension was at, but you missed the mark big time. I'm pissed at guys who are writing reviews of SBs and getting them BANNED from the SD sites!

Doc Holiday, no one here. Eccie has an entire thread dedicated to Sugar Baby reviews. I know 4 women who have been banned from SA because they were reviewed. The two are not supposed to connect. SA does not want obvious escorts and they will ban women if found out even though we know 80 percent of guys and girls are doing both.

Alas, Sugar Babies are still selling/bartering time and sexual services, which arguably makes them escorts/companions engaged in P4P despite any personal arrangements otherwise for loyalty, compensation, or promotion, and ergo they are usually subject to review on Hobby boards. However, this is valuable info urging discretion by participants, so thank you for posting the topic, Kimberly! I'm sure many were unaware and hadn't considered how unwise such reviews could be.

Best for lassies to use different screen names, photos, and contact methods for additional protection when advertising as both a SB and as a "traditional" provider.

By the way, on H2, admin will honor a NO-REVIEW POLICY by any member lass IF posted in her signatures line. -- FIH/staff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TexasRiley

Why are overly mad about the amount of money SBs are getting. You mentioned it several times. The amount of money SBs are making and being upset that men have seen an SB instead???!!!

---

wtf

you completely missed her point o.o

she's 'overly mad' about wankers posting stuff on SBs, and she mentions how rates can be affected by that stuff...

then, that stuff can ultimately determine an SB's income (either greatly or terribly)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TexasRiley

3. There will always be **** that are sugar babies and sugar babies that are ****.

---

no shit, Sherlock

!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Phoenixx

wtf

you completely missed her point o.o

she's 'overly mad' about wankers posting stuff on SBs, and she mentions how rates can be affected by that stuff...

then, that stuff can ultimately determine an SB's income (either greatly or terribly)





no shit, Sherlock

!

---

Lmfao!!! This!

Fancy, thank you. I always used a different name but we can only take so many pics. Even if they do use a different name, the person is still banned because these dummies are actually putting their direct link on SA. When they see website traffic from Eccie leading to x profile, ba bye. I think sugar baby reviews are just plain stupid. I'm under no obligation to give x the same rate as z over there, but here it's an advertised rate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kimberly Kisses

When they see website traffic from Eccie leading to x profile, ba bye. I think sugar baby reviews are just plain stupid.

---

it can also freak the SB out if they don't know where all that traffic is coming from as well...

SMDH

Simple solution:

Just don’t review SB’s on OH2, Eccie and similar sites. A SB/SD arrangement is a much more private matter than hiring an escort

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by myren1900

Simple solution:

Just don’t review SB’s on OH2, Eccie and similar sites. A SB/SD arrangement is a much more private matter than hiring an escort

---

This was my exact point. Thank you. ��

- - - Updated - - -

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Phoenixx

it can also freak the SB out if they don't know where all that traffic is coming from as well...

SMDH

---

Yes, exactly. Not all of these girls are escorts in their minds lol so it does tend to scare them when they see their real name and damn near the actual location of their personal home. These women don't think or protect themselves and personal information like escorts unless they are schooled.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kimberly Kisses

Yes, exactly. Not all of these girls are escorts in their minds lol so it does tend to scare them when they see their real name and damn near the actual location of their personal home. These women don't think or protect themselves and personal information like escorts unless they are schooled.

---

EXACTLY

I cringe at SB reviews on ECCIE that have the SB's contact info such as phone or email visible because it's more than likely their
personal contact info since as you said, most of them don't know nor care to protect themselves

Seeking also doesn't age verify their sugar baby accounts, and many other websites that bros find pay for play (P4P) on don't age verify either.
Yet, they'll end up being reviewed on ECCIE, of course. Despite not being verified on ECCIE....

escort review sites should only allow reviews of the escorts that are actually registered AND verified on there such as TNABoard & PrivateDelights

review boards like ECCIE give bros the freedom to review any P4P encounter with anyone

Anyone.



companions should incorporate reputation management of their stage name via Mention,
so that they can be aware of whenever & wherever they're mentioned or reviewed online... my $0.02

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Phoenixx

EXACTLY

I cringe at SB reviews on ECCIE that have the SB's contact info such as phone or email visible because it's more than likely their
personal contact info since as you said, most of them don't know nor care to protect themselves

Seeking also doesn't age verify their sugar baby accounts, and many other websites that bros find pay for play (P4P) on don't age verify either.
Yet, they'll end up being reviewed on ECCIE, of course. Despite not being verified on ECCIE....

escort review sites should only allow reviews of the escorts that are actually registered AND verified on there such as TNABoard & PrivateDelights

review boards like ECCIE give bros the freedom to review any P4P encounter with anyone

Anyone.



companions should incorporate reputation management of their stage name via Mention,
so that they can be aware of whenever & wherever they're mentioned or reviewed online... my $0.02

---

With you 100 on this! You've got guys posting reviews of a runaway they found at the bus station. Disgusting @

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kimberly Kisses

You've got guys posting reviews of a runaway they found at the bus station. Disgusting @

---

not surprised!

they review anyone they pay...


Anyone.

Interesting topic. I appreciate you raising the concerns you have Kimberly. Personally, I always wondered about the ethics of reviewing a SB on an escort-client site especially since I wondered if said SB even knew the review existed or consented to be reviewed. It always made me feel a way. It's just a reality that some clients get off on seeking out new, young, inexperienced, "non-pro" people on sites like SA and WYP specifically because they enjoy the thrill of finding a diamond in the rough who's willing to spend several hours with them for what most escorts charge for only an hour.

But in my mind they can't have it both ways. If you want someone who isn't a pro so you can arrange a 300 PPM and spend three, four, five, or more hours with someone for that amount, then keep up your end of the bargain by at least maintaining some discretion.

Boom! I wholeheartedly agree. In addition to the points you and Kimberly addressed about clients possibly unknowingly outing an SB's IRL name and contact, there's this...

It's funny because ECCIE went to such great lengths to appease the payment processors and attempt to limit some of their liability. But there are so many ways they are exposed. And allowing men to post reviews which partially function as ads on non-age verified people, meanwhile a provider can't post herself if she didn't submit age verification seems very precarious.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Phoenixx

...Seeking also doesn't age verify their sugar baby accounts, and many other websites that bros find pay for play (P4P) on don't age verify either.
Yet, they'll end up being reviewed on ECCIE, of course. Despite not being verified on ECCIE....

escort review sites should only allow reviews of the escorts that are actually registered AND verified on there such as TNABoard & PrivateDelights

review boards like ECCIE give bros the freedom to review any P4P encounter with anyone..

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lena Duvall

Boom! I wholeheartedly agree. In addition to the points you and Kimberly addressed about clients possibly unknowingly outing an SB's IRL name and contact, there's this...

It's funny because ECCIE went to such great lengths to appease the payment processors and attempt to limit some of their liability. But there are so many ways they are exposed. And allowing men to post reviews which partially function as ads on non-age verified people, meanwhile a provider can't post herself if she didn't submit age verification seems very precarious.

---

Uhhh, EXACTLY! But, we get a year ban for outing a fake name! Ignorant!

- - - Updated - - -

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Phoenixx

not surprised!

they review anyone they pay...


Anyone.

---

And, they're worried about providers lol. Like hello idiot, you reviewed a 16 year old and included a photo. ������

Talking about sugar babies, this one doesn't have sex and makes 20,000 a month. Interesting
https://viralfeels.com/sugar-baby-re...ing-with-them/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Universal

Talking about sugar babies, this one doesn't have sex and makes 20,000 a month. Interesting
https://viralfeels.com/sugar-baby-re...ing-with-them/

---

intimacy was prolly shared that evening from the pic where she had a bath
robe on in the Daily Mail

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Universal

Talking about sugar babies, this one doesn't have sex and makes 20,000 a month. Interesting
https://viralfeels.com/sugar-baby-re...ing-with-them/

---

That's what she says lol.��

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kimberly Kisses

That's what she says lol.��

---

right hah

I can believe that she has some platonic SDs; however, I'm sure she also
other SDs that want intimacy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Phoenixx

right hah

I can believe that she has some platonic SDs; however, I'm sure she also
other SDs that want intimacy

---

Personally, I crack up at all the gullible ones who actually let themselves get strung along for weeks without getting any action, so sure she's not banging someone else. They really DON'T want honesty, because they'd realize that dinner and Victoria Secret trip is not paying her bills, so something is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kimberly Kisses

Personally, I crack up at all the gullible ones who actually let themselves get strung along for weeks without getting any action, so sure she's not banging someone else. They really DON'T want honesty, because they'd realize that dinner and Victoria Secret trip is not paying her bills, so something is.

---

stringing someone along is cruel

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Universal

stringing someone along is cruel

---

Agreed. I wouldn't have the patience for that nonsense.