Amazing Miu

Agency/Spa/Club Name, Companion's Handle: Starroom K-Girls, Miu
Date of Visit: 10-Feb-2024
Preferred Method of Contact: SMS Text
Phone Number: 737.710.6060
Email Address: Starroom516@gmail.com
Website, Ad, or Profile URL: https://starroom-kgirls.com
City, State: San Antonio, Texas
Location: NW San Antonio
Type of Visit: Incall
Was the Appointment On-Time?? Yes
Activities: LFK, DFK, NE, SE, DATY, FIV, BBBJ, HJ, 69, CG, ACG, MISH, Doggie, Jockey, MSOG
Length of Visit: 1 Hour
Approximate age of Companion: 3X
Hair Color and Length: Shoulder-length light brown
Smoking Status: I Couldn't Tell
Ethnic/Racial background: Asian
Companion Description: From the website...

Quote:

---

Height : 5'4?
Weight : 91 lbs
Breast Cup : 32C

---

I'd say that is accurate. All-natural with a few tattoos (not shown in pics).
https://starroom-kgirls.com/image/ca...-800x1200.jpeg
Meet or Exceed Your Expectations?? Exceed
Would you recommend this Agency/Spa?? Yes. absolutely
Would You Recommend this Companion?? Yes, absolutely

Public comments:
TCB was easy with the scheduler. Was able to find the new location easily, even coming in from out of town.

The rest of the story is hidden. You must be a verified hobbyist to view additional content.

Thanks for sharing the encounter.

Is it actually the girl in the pictures or "her type"?

:giggles::giggles::giggles:

Although I haven't seen any of the ladies from Starroom K yet, I have been following the reports very closely across several review websites.

Most guys report that the photos are close in likeness but NOT actual photos of the advertised ladies.
Every K-Girl or Asian Agency I've ever seen ads/reviews for seem to follow this format.

Agencies that advertise on the scraper sites and EVERY Asian Massage Parlor just use fake pics of hot girls. You can easily test/check them using tineye.

Seeing that Starroom K moved away from downtown is better, but I think the best area for them would be an Airport location.

I'm a 25 year hobbyist.
If the booker for Starroom is reading the reviews/comments, I believe the response to your ads would be TEN TIMES HIGHER if you used ACTUAL photos of the girls and blurred out their face just enough to see that they are attractive, but not enough to get a positive ID from her face pic.

Just my $0.08 (thanks to Bidenomics).

Good luck.
JW

If the booker for Starroom K is reading the reports...

Here is a perfect example of a REAL Pic of a REAL Girl with just enough blurring of her face to protect her privacy, but just un-blurred enough to tell she's hot.

https://media.tryst.a4cdn.org/IAXJf-...f4ac023bf2.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by richardscott

Thanks for sharing the encounter.

Is it actually the girl in the pictures or "her type"?

:giggles::giggles::giggles:

---

Can I say 100% without a doubt it is her. No. I think it is her (her face and body)...but the photos are either before she had tattoos, or they were photoshopped out.

I have seen a few ladies where the photos definitely don't match who they are IRL. I don't post any known false photos on any of my writeups.

That picture has been digitally massaged.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Precious_b

That picture has been digitally massaged.

---

Any woman posting anywhere (never mind the hobby) knows how to use filters...never mind the professional retouching that is done. I find it hilarious people are still asking if these pics are "100% them". We are well past that day and age.

I want to know who asked if it was "100% them"? No one. So I don't know who you are referencing. Of course we all know it's not 100% them, but when they post pictures of a 120lbs woman and end up being 170+ that's beyond "filters" and "touch-ups". I see nothing wrong with asking how close to the image these women are. Unfortunately, too many hobbyists on here are so grateful to have their cock touched by a woman that they have a "bliss" lens over their eyes and they see a "Scarlett Johansson" where an "Amy Schumer" really is.

LOL...

Woahbro23 called it.

In my 25 years of hobbying,
I have seen one immutable truth.

The more attractive a provider is
IRL (W/O Filters)

The more forgiving (less honest)
the reviewers are in their reviews.
Don the Rose-Colored Glasses!

I can count on one hand the number
of amazing experiences I've had
over the years with a super hot provider.

Sadly most of them were $500+
and took a monumental amount of
research before hand.

But unicorns DO exist...

The rest of the story is hidden. You must be a verified hobbyist to view additional content.

Good luck
JW

I asked if it was her or her type.

Because most girls use their actual pictures (with filters, touch ups, makeup, studio lights, whatever...) but it is them.

There are also a handful that use pictures that are not them at all... I recall about a year and a half ago there was a blonde 18 yr old working for an agency and even though the girl was pretty most of her pictures were absolutely NOT her - like not the same person - not talking about an issue of filters smoothing her face and making it flawless - I'm talking about not the same human. The same with a very well known touring colombian girl, she is very attractive, but uses IG model Andrea Garcia pics.

So I was just curious what was the case with this particular provider.

JohnnyWadd,

1K on a first date is crazy man.. sorry that happen though.

Yeah.. I think I would have done a short flyby first at those rates to see what all the buzz was about. Sorry she turned out to be a dud for you...

SOME of you hear are nowhere near as tenured nor have enough reviews that I've seen on this site as SecretE. So I'd just say, take his word FWIW and keep it moving. OR better yet, go see for yourselves how they look. Then do a review.

These girls look really hot. I see they offer BB for and extra $.. Really is tempting. New Girl Helen looks like she does it all...oh, and now they are close to where I work..Trigger Finger is itching

Yeah, keeps getting better and according to their site another one is joining the lineup tomorrow 2/21.

I still don't trust those pics though lol but definitely intrigued

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GeorgeDRII

SOME of you hear are nowhere near as tenured nor have enough reviews that I've seen on this site as SecretE. So I'd just say, take his word FWIW and keep it moving. OR better yet, go see for yourselves how they look. Then do a review.

---

Thank. You. George! :-)

I'm just one reference point, gentlemen. Like I said, I wouldn't knowingly post photos, if I knew they weren't them. We have one lady who is a frequent visitor to a K-Girl agency in Austin, who definitely uses photos that aren't her...and in my writeup of her, I never posted those photos in the writeup, and even said it wasn't her in those photos. I do believe these photos were actually the lady I saw (Miu).

I've said enough on this. If you don't believe me, wait for someone else you trust to review these ladies, or just move on.