I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say, IIFFOFRDB.
But I'm sure it has nothing to do with anything directed at another poster on this board, right?
Printable View
I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say, IIFFOFRDB.
But I'm sure it has nothing to do with anything directed at another poster on this board, right?
You should really try to keep up with current events. Both you and the MSM should do yourselves a favor and read this...
https://imagessl4.casadellibro.com/a...0345479174.jpg
Then you would know exactly what's going on. Kim Jong Un has read it and is trying to use Trump's own techniques against him. Unfortunately for Kim, you just can't outsmart the master of the deal. Trump's already five or six moves ahead of him.
Attachment 27029
- - - Updated - - -
Attachment 27036
It wouldn't surprise me if Trump suggested he is considering issuing preemptive pardons to all of them. Claim it's time for the nation to move on. That would make the main stream media's heads explode...AGAIN.
It fascinates me that they don't see that he's yanking their chain. The media wants so badly to be the tail wagging the dog they can't see their own stupidity.
Haven't read Trump's Art of the Deal and, he has had a history of swindling people resulting in numerous lawsuits.
With that said, a friend from college was recently telling me about the book giving some excerpts on how he founded the Hotel. Trump is a good stratgeist...
The Dotard's tweet was about China, not Rocket Man, and it was tweeted on 05/13/2018. Certainly more current than Schwartz' 1987 book. If I want to learn about the art of the con, I'll go to Dotard U. (I know, too late, all gone). Rocket Man plays checkers; the Dotard plays tiddlywinks; Xi plays chess. Don't get me wrong. I'm not rooting for Xi (or Rocket Man), but real estate con games aren't going to work on the world stage.
Back to Rocket Man, the Dotard may end up with a hotel in N.K., but that's good for him, not the U.S.
Narrow thinking vs broader picture. Not surprised.
Speaking of "narrow thinking."
I know it's an old (in this Administration anything is OLD that isn't on Twitter today) story, but well worth a read.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/04/o...nion&smtyp=cur
I see the self-proclaimed Nobel Prize winner has started a "witch hunt" of his own.
HAHAHHAHAHA!:giggles:
You ****** ***** are just butt hurt because he may be doing a job well done...
*No personal attacks on board members please.- gfe*
Donates his salary to charity, so ain't in the WH for a paycheck, like most Politicians.
So what is in it for him?Attachment 27517
Satisfaction.